And Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, founder and president of The Israel Project, it's a non-profit organization that promotes the Israeli point of view on security issues.
Welcome to you both.
Jennifer Mizrahi, why do you think we're seeing this escalation in the bloodshed, in the clashes between Israel and Hamas in Gaza right now?
JENNIFER LASZLO MIZRAHI, The Israel Project: Well, first of all, Margaret, as you know, it's been going on for seven years, the rockets that have been going into Israel. And Israel thought and really wanted it to happen that it would stop and gave up all of Gaza three years ago almost in hopes for peace.
But the rockets didn't stop. And the real change has been that Hamas knocked down the border between them and Egypt. And when that happened, when that border was broken recently, more sophisticated weapons from Iran and others, along with trained terrorists, moved into Gaza, which enabled the terrorists in Gaza to shoot these longer, more precise missiles and rockets into Israel, putting 200,000 Israeli lives at risk.
MARGARET WARNER: But right after Israeli soldiers left, for instance, today there were more rocket attacks. What does Israel think it can achieve with these retaliatory strikes and these sort of limited ground incursions?
JENNIFER LASZLO MIZRAHI: It's a very difficult challenge. There's almost a no-win solution for the Israelis, because so much is in the hands of the Palestinians from Hamas, which has already said it wants to destroy Israel. So much is in their hands.
But Israel is not going to take the rockets anymore. These thousands of rockets that are coming down onto the communities, intentionally targeting kindergartens and hospitals, they can't take it anymore. And they're going to do everything they can to defend their people.
MARGARET WARNER: Professor Makdisi, what do you think explains the escalation to this point right now?
SAREE MAKDISI, UCLA: Well, I mean, I think it's important to bear in mind that the Israeli occupation began not eight years ago or seven years ago or three years ago, but 41 years ago. So Israel's response in the past two days or the past two weeks or months is an escalation of a strategy that's been continuing for decades.
It's important to understand that it's not just in response to the rocket attacks and that however illegal and immoral those rocket attacks are -- and I think they are -- it's important to be able to understand what they're coming from and what they're in response to and also, most importantly, how to stop civilian deaths on both sides of the border, in Israel and in Gaza, and in the West Bank, for that matter.
SAREE MAKDISI: Well,
remember, it's not actually in full control of Gaza. Gaza, according to
international law, is still under Israeli occupation, because Israel
controls the borders, the air space, territorial waters, and all access
to Gaza, essentially. So what that means is that actually Hamas
isn't in control of Gaza. It's in control of some things on the ground
within Gaza, but Israel remains the occupying power. Israel, therefore,
is responsible, for example, for the welfare of the population. Why
Hamas is doing this -- I mean, there are two or three reasons. One is
partly in order to reassert that Hamas can't be excluded from the
political process between Israel and the Palestinians, which is
essentially what Israel and the U.S. would like to have happen. In
fact, that's what they have done. And, secondly, they're trying
to show internally to Palestinians that they are capable of doing what
Fatah leadership in the West Bank is incapable of doing, which is
standing up to Israel. Now, that doesn't justify firing rockets
at civilian targets. I don't think anybody is justified in firing
rockets at civilian targets. But the important thing is to
understand where the rocket attacks are coming from and what needs to
be done to stop them, which is to stop a 41-year-old illegal occupation. MARGARET WARNER: What do you say to that? JENNIFER
LASZLO MIZRAHI: There's not a single Israeli in Gaza. I was in Gaza
when Israel gave it up. Nine thousand Israelis lived in Gaza. All of
their homes were given up. All of their places of business, their
places of worship, their schools were all given up. Not a single Israeli was left inside Gaza. Still to call it an occupation is not a fair assessment at all. MARGARET
WARNER: But what I'm also asking you is what the professor said about
why Hamas is saying they want to be -- they want to have a seat at the
table, they want to be included, that they're continuing these attacks
in a way in a bid to be recognized as players. JENNIFER LASZLO
MIZRAHI: I think everyone would love for Hamas to be a player. It's
such an easy thing for Hamas to be at the table. All they have to do is
recognize Israel's right to exist in freedom, in peace, in security,
and then start to negotiate without trying to be a power that just
wants to clearly eliminate Israel. MARGARET WARNER: And, Professor, Hamas won't agree to those conditions, is that right? SAREE
MAKDISI: Yes, but the question is, will Israel recognize Palestine? In
other words, what the Israelis are asking for is for Palestinians to
give them all the recognition they're asking for without giving any
recognition in turn, which, if you think about it, it's sort of
illogical. The second thing is, in terms of recognizing Israel's
right to exist, the question is, which Israel exactly? As you know,
Israel declared its independence in 1948 in what had been until then
Palestine.Neither side recognizes the other
MARGARET
WARNER: Let me ask the counterpoint to the question I asked Ms.
Mizrahi, which is, why is Hamas continuing these rocket attacks now
that it's in full control of Gaza?
SAREE MAKDISI: East Jerusalem -- yes, go ahead. MARGARET
WARNER: ... could I just interrupt and try to drill down a little more
here? I guess what I'm asking here is that Abbas has been in these
peace talks now with Israel for a few months. And there have been, as
you both said, other skirmishes, no doubt. Yet he's stayed in the talks until now. Why did he pull out now? And what do you think this means for this peace process? SAREE
MAKDISI: I mean, I think the big question is, what is the peace process
meant to accomplish? If you think about the fact that the Israelis all
through the peace process, from the 1990s on, have continued to expand
their settlements and to expand the extent to which they control the
West Bank and East Jerusalem and to continue increasing their settler
population in the occupied territories, one has to ask, well, what is
it that's being negotiated exactly? At this point, according to
the U.N., 40 percent of the West Bank is off-limits to Palestinians.
It's under Israeli control, just institutionally and demographically
and in terms of infrastructure and so forth. So what exactly is there
left to negotiate? MARGARET WARNER: But Abbas has thought there is something to negotiate. So what I'm asking you is, why is he now pulling out? SAREE
MAKDISI: Because it would be -- I mean, if you just think about it from
his standpoint, for him to go on negotiating with the Israelis while
they're starving and bombing his people in Gaza would be, to say the
least, ungentlemanly, basically. MARGARET WARNER: What do you
think this is meaning for the peace process? Do you think now -- I
mean, you've got Condi Rice going over there trying to keep it going,
but one of your two main actors is no longer at the table. JENNIFER
LASZLO MIZRAHI: Well, first of all, I reject the other guest's premise
that Israel doesn't want there to be a Palestinian state. Israel deeply
wants there to be a Palestinian state and wants Palestinians to have a
better future. They're eager to move the peace process forward. They're in negotiations. The
fact that Abbas has suspended the negotiations is obviously a
challenge. But the fact, as we all know, Margaret, you can't move
forward on the negotiations as long as rockets are being shot into
Israel.Abbas withdraws in due to violence
MARGARET WARNER: But, Professor...
JENNIFER LASZLO MIZRAHI: It's very
simple. If the rockets stop going into Israel, there will be no need
for the Israelis to go into Gaza. That's all that needs to happen. Then
I'd like to see -- and I think all Israelis would like to see -- there
to be progress on the peace front, because what all the Israeli
government leaders are looking for is a two-state solution that will
make it better for all in the region. MARGARET WARNER: And, Professor, what would it take for Hamas to agree to stop the rocket attacks? SAREE
MAKDISI: I think Hamas should stop the rocket attacks irrespective of
an agreement. But what it would take, really, to end this conflict is
for Israel to abide by international law, by Geneva Convention, by
Security Council resolutions, to end its occupation of the occupied
territories, including East Jerusalem and the West Bank and Gaza, and
to allow the rule of law to prevail, which is something it's resisted
doing for four decades now. MARGARET WARNER: But are you saying that, in the meantime, the rocket attacks will continue? SAREE
MAKDISI: No, I mean, it's not for me to say, but I don't think there
should be any rocket attacks. I mean, the rocket attacks are in
response to an ongoing situation. The situation is determined by the
occupation. If the occupation stops, everything else will stop, as well. MARGARET WARNER: All right, Professor Makdisi and Ms. Mizrahi, thank you both. JENNIFER LASZLO MIZRAHI: Thank you for having me. SAREE MAKDISI: Thank you.Each side wants the other to move
MARGARET
WARNER: I'm going to ask you both to answer this fairly briefly in our
remaining time. And I'll start with you, Ms. Mizrahi. So what will it
take to solve this immediate -- I'm talking about the immediate issue
now -- of this escalating violence between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and
right outside of Gaza?